Abstract
Objective
To compare the analgesic efficacy of burst-modulated medium-frequency alternating current (BMAC) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) using an experimental cold pain model.
Design
Within-group crossover study.
Setting
A university research laboratory.
Participants
Twenty healthy subjects.
Interventions
BMAC (4-kHz AC applied in 4-millisecond bursts at 50 Hz) and TENS (125-microsecond phase duration applied at a frequency of 50 Hz) administered to each participant on separate occasions.
Main outcome measure
Time to cold pain threshold.
Results
The mean time to cold pain threshold with the BMAC intervention was no different than with TENS. Statistical analysis showed that both interventions elevated the cold pain threshold significantly [BMAC: increase = 15.2 seconds, 97.5% confidence interval (CI) 3.1 to 27.2, P = 0.01; TENS: increase = 15.4 seconds, 97.5%CI 2.5 to 28.4, P = 0.02], and the difference between interventions was not simply insignificant but the intervention effects were ‘significantly the same’ (mean difference = 0.3 seconds, 95%CI −15.3 to 15.9, P = 0.97).
Conclusions
BMAC is as effective as TENS in increasing cold pain thresholds in healthy subjects. Since BMAC has been shown to be more comfortable than TENS in previous studies and is likely to be better accepted and tolerated by patients, clinical investigation is warranted.
Keywords
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
Subscribe:
Subscribe to PhysiotherapyAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
-
Electrophysical agents: implications of their availability and use in undergraduate clinical placements.Physiotherapy. 1998; 84: 335-344
-
A survey of electrotherapeutic modalities: ownership and use in the NHS in England.Physiotherapy. 1995; 81: 82-91
-
Electrotherapy explained: principles and practice.4th ed. Butterworth–Heinemann, Oxford2006
-
Electrical currents.in: Cameron M. Physical agents in rehabilitation. WB Saunders Co, Philadelphia1999: 345-427
-
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation characteristics for altering pain perception.Phys Ther. 1986; 66: 1515-1521
-
Analgesic effects of different frequencies of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on cold-induced pain in normal subjects.Pain. 1989; 39: 231-236
-
The effect of pain quality on the efficacy of conventional TENS.Physiother Can. 1992; 44: 35-40
-
Psychophysical responses to experimentally induced heat and cold pain before, during, and after transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.Neuromodulation. 2003; 6: 229-236
-
Effects of acupoints TENS on heat pain threshold in normal subjects.Chin. Med J. 2003; 116: 1864-1868
-
The analgesic effects of different swing patterns of interferential currents on cold-induced pain.Physiotherapy. 1997; 83: 461-467
-
Electrotherapy for pain relief: does it work? A laboratory-based study to examine the analgesic effects of electrotherapy on cold-induced pain in healthy individuals.Clin Effect Nurs. 1999; 3: 14-24
-
A single-blind placebo-controlled investigation into the analgesic effects of interferential currents on experimentally induced ischaemic pain in healthy subjects.Clin Physiol Funct Imag. 2002; 22: 187-196
-
A single-blind investigation into the hypoalgesic effects of different swing patterns of interferential currents on cold-induced pain in healthy volunteers.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 84: 350-357
-
The analgesic effects of interferential (IF) current on cold-pressor pain in healthy subjects: a single blind trial of three IF currents against sham IF and control.Physiother Theor Pract. 2003; 19: 99-107
-
An investigation into the analgesic effects of different frequencies of the amplitude-modulated wave of interferential current therapy on cold-induced pain in normal subjects.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 84: 1387-1394
-
An investigation into the analgesic effects of interferential currents and transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation on experimentally induced ischaemic pain in otherwise pain-free volunteers.Phys Ther. 2003; 83: 208-223
-
The effect of three electrotherapeutic modalities upon peripheral nerve conduction and mechanical pain threshold.Clin Physiol. 2001; 21: 704-711
-
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation: nonparallel antinociceptive effects on chronic clinical pain and acute experimental pain.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999; 80: 305-312
-
A double blind placebo controlled investigation into the analgesic effects of inferential currents (IFC) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on cold-induced pain in healthy subjects.Physiother Theor Pract. 1999; 15: 217-233
-
A comparison of the hypoalgesic effectiveness of low frequency and burst modulated kHz frequency currents.Phys Ther. 2007; 87: 1056-1063
-
Comparison of the analgesic efficacy of interferential therapy and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.Physiotherapy. 2006; 92: 247-253
-
Electrical stimulation using kHz frequency alternating current.Phys Ther. 2009; 89: 181-190
-
Wrist extensor torque production and discomfort associated with low frequency and burst modulated kHz frequency currents.Phys Ther. 2006; 86: 1360-1367
-
The effect of duty cycle and frequency on muscle torque production using kHz frequency range alternating current.Med Eng Phys. 2004; 26: 569-579
-
The analgesic effects of interferential therapy on two experimental pain models: cold and mechanically induced pain.Physiotherapy. 2006; 92: 95-102
-
Foundations of clinical research.2nd ed. Prentice Hall Health, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey2000
Afegeix-hi un comentari: